How to Build a CRM Strategy: A Step-by-Step Guide

December 28, 2021

The purpose of customer relationship management (CRM) is to attract and retain customers. At Kona Kai Corporation, we believe that a great CRM strategy should focus on the goal of aggregating customer data in a useful format, and in a manner that can translate to your entire market. The result of an effective CRM strategy, then, should always be that your organization has an increased understanding of the market for your product or service in a meaningful way.


Creating a CRM strategy that will make the most of the tools available to you is the best way to maximize success and create synergy within your marketing efforts. Read on for our step-by-step guide to developing a unique CRM strategy that can carry your company forward.


Step 1: Find and Implement CRM Software that Works for You


One of the keys to a great CRM system is CRM software, and using that software correctly makes all the difference. At Kona Kai, we’ve partnered with Pegasystems, a low code software provider, whose AI powered CRM Suite has the ability to transform the way your organization drives greater engagement across the entire customer journey.



Pega’s software not only organizes information about current and prospective customers, including their questions, quotes, purchases, and contracts, but it also facilitates effective communication with customers and prospects. With Pega’s CRM engagement suite, marketing, sales automation, and customer service tools come together to increase your company’s profits.


Key features of Pega’s customer service system include case management, guided interaction, digital self-service, chat & messaging, and robotic process automation capabilities. Unlike other CRM software systems, Pega’s customer service suite is tailored to deliver focused results without unnecessary features your team won’t use. For example, the objective of Pega’s case management system is to minimize your team’s cost-to-serve and manage increased sales volume simultaneously. It’s one of the many reasons Gartner named Pega as a leader in their Magic Quadrant for CRM customer engagement for 12 consecutive years, and The Forrester Wave ranked Pega #1 in real-time interaction management for 2020 Q4.


Step 2: Set Clear, Measurable Objectives for CRM


Your company’s mission statement is likely customer service centered. It makes sense that your CRM goals should be, too. A great place to start is to map customer pain points throughout their individual interaction with your product or service.


Begin mapping out the customer’s needs as a prospect. Consider how your customers first hear about you, how they find you, and where they’re looking. What image of your company are they getting from the marketing material or word-of-mouth information available to them at this stage? Continue mapping your customer’s journey through their experience with the actual product or service they’ve purchased. What are their interactions like with your support staff? Are they being adequately supported? Are they leaving the interaction with a better opinion of your company than they started with?


Keep in mind that while you’re mapping the customer’s interaction journey with your product or brand, the negatives may be obvious. This is especially true with the increase of consumers taking mostly unconstructive viewpoints to social media as a place to vent. It’s important to address what you may be doing wrong, but don’t forget to highlight what your customers already love and what your team is doing right. Getting even better at something that’s already working well will serve to amplify the positive things your company is known for.


After obtaining a complete picture of the customer’s journey, gather a few things you know would be impactful to improve upon. These items can be used to direct new ideas for marketing initiatives, including social media and email strategies.


Step 3: Coach Employees with a Goal-Focused Approach

 

Your new CRM strategies will, at the end of the day, be implemented by your employees, so it’s important to coach them on the end-goals. Empower your team by showing them not only what CRM software can do, but how they can use it to help advance your organization’s new vision for customer relationship management.


When you mapped your customer journey in Step 2, you gathered data about what your customers wanted and needed before they heard of your company. CRM-based coaching can include, for example, communicating these insights with your digital marketing managers, who can create new advertising content tailored to meet those specific desires. 


Step 4: Collaborate Company-Wide

 

Even if your marketing, sales, and customer service occupy the same department, collaboration can feel unnatural for employees who have settled into a routine. Kona Kai is uniquely positioned to help with spurring energetic collaboration in your organization, which is critical to the ultimate success of your well-thought-out CRM strategy.


Employee introductions to new strategies can be bumpy, and it’s possible that without a focus on collaboration, efforts will be duplicated, and time will be wasted. Change Management is the process of transitioning individuals, teams, and organizations through a workplace change, and it’s what Kona Kai has decades of combined experience in perfecting. As experts in change management, Kona Kai can step in and ensure your employees can continue to do their jobs effectively and efficiently with a clear picture of what is needed from them.


Step 5. Test, Adapt, and, if Needed, Change


Implementing a new CRM strategy is like any other business initiative, in that perhaps the most important step is to periodically look back and assess how your process is working to achieve your initial goals.


Look at each CRM “section” and measure its performance along with the metrics you set out to improve. Is customer service getting questions answered, problems addressed, and leaving current customers happy? Is marketing creating the impression of your company that you want to project? Are sales reaching the most qualified prospects, and following through to turn them into customers?


Developing an effective CRM strategy is complex, but Kona Kai can make it simple for you. Kona Kai has helped countless organizations in industries such as healthcare, insurance, distribution, telecom, and beyond, succeed in CRM. If your team could benefit from the assistance of experts in CRM and change management, now is the time to contact Kona Kai and get started with a positive shift.


INSIGHTS

The AI Skills Gap Isn't Going to Close on Its Own

By Paul Benvenuto • August 19, 2026
AI is changing workforce training from a one-time project into a continuous business capability. For decades, enterprise technology transformations have followed a predictable pattern. A new system is implemented, then employees learn how to use it. Productivity dips for a while, then recovers as the organization adapts. Whether it was a CRM implementation, ERP modernization, a claims platform replacement, or a core banking upgrade, the skills gap eventually disappeared because the technology itself stopped changing. AI is different. Unlike traditional enterprise software, AI capabilities continue to evolve after implementation. New models are released, AI agents become more capable, and workflows change faster than most organizations can retrain employees. The result is a workforce that isn't simply learning a new system, but continuously adapting to one. That fundamentally changes how organizations should think about workforce readiness. Recent research from the World Economic Forum and Microsoft's Work Trend Index suggests many organizations already recognize the challenge. Are enterprises doing enough to prepare for a skills gap that may never close? AI Changes the Rules for Workforce Training Traditional enterprise software had a finish line. Once employees learned the new system, their knowledge remained valuable for years. Training programs could be planned, measured, completed, and archived because the technology itself remained relatively stable. AI doesn't offer that stability. Employees who learned effective prompting techniques six months ago may now be using AI agents. Teams that started with document generation may now be automating entire workflows. Capabilities continue to expand, changing what effective work looks like almost as quickly as organizations can document it. That means workforce readiness can no longer be viewed as a milestone that follows implementation, as it needs to become part of day-to-day operations. The AI Skills Gap Doesn't End After Go-Live The challenge isn't simply that AI is changing jobs. It's that AI itself keeps changing. Foundation models continue to improve. New copilots are released. AI agents take on increasingly sophisticated tasks. Features that didn't exist six months ago become standard workflow tomorrow. Employees aren’t learning one “system” because they need to continuously adapt to new capabilities. Someone who learned the most effective way to use AI six months ago may already be working differently today. Traditional training models weren't designed for that pace of change. AI Is Reshaping the Workforce Faster Than Organizations Can Respond The World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025 highlights just how significant this challenge has become.

Trustworthy AI Starts With the Data You Can't See.

By Paul Benvenuto • July 31, 2026
PwC's April 2026 AI Performance Study surveyed 1,217 senior executives across 25 sectors and found something that should reframe how every regulated organization talks about AI investment: nearly three quarters of AI's economic value is being captured by just one fifth of organizations. Not because that top fifth has better models. PwC is specific about the differentiator: those organizations are 1.7 times more likely to have a Responsible AI framework and 1.5 times more likely to have a cross functional AI governance board. Their employees trust AI outputs at twice the rate of everyone else's. The value gap is structural, not a matter of who bought the better tool. That finding lands differently once you connect it to where trust actually comes from. It doesn't come from a more sophisticated model. It comes from knowing where your data originated, who touched it along the way, and what controls sat around it the entire time.  McKinsey's June 2026 research on AI data readiness makes the case that most organizations manage data like a storage problem when they should be managing it like a supply chain. A single PDF can expand into extracted text, tables, images, metadata, sensitivity tags, and quality scores, each one an intermediate artifact that AI systems reuse and recombine downstream. A small error introduced upstream doesn't stay small. It propagates. This matters more in regulated industries than almost anywhere else, because the data causing the most exposure is usually the data getting the least attention. Structured fields get governed. Clinical notes, claim narratives, loan officer comments, and audit trails, the unstructured stuff, usually don't, even though AI systems depend on it heavily. Gartner and IDC both put the share of enterprise data that is unstructured at somewhere around 80 to 90 percent. McKinsey's own research doesn't cite that specific figure, but makes the same underlying point: unstructured content is where AI systems draw the most context, and where governance attention is thinnest. None of this is an argument for waiting until your data is perfect before you deploy anything. PwC's 2026 Digital Trends in Operations Survey argues directly against that instinct: AI can help bridge data gaps, particularly through agents that reason using whatever data is actually available. The real mandate isn't clean data as a prerequisite. It's disciplined governance and iterative improvement running in parallel with deployment, calibrated to how much risk a given use case actually carries. So what does that look like in practice for a CIO or CDO sitting inside a regulated organization right now? A few diagnostic questions worth asking before your next AI initiative launches: Where does data quality actually break down in your pipeline, and does anyone own fixing it? Is lineage visible for the data feeding your highest risk AI use cases, or is it assumed? Where do unstructured assets, like clinical notes, policy documents, and loan files, enter your systems without any governance attached? Have you defined what "good enough" data quality means for each use case, calibrated to its actual risk profile, rather than applying one standard everywhere? Answering those honestly is uncomfortable in most organizations, because the answer is usually "we don't fully know." That's the point. You cannot govern what you cannot see, and you cannot trust an AI output built on a data foundation nobody has actually traced. The organizations in PwC's top 20 percent didn't get there by waiting for perfect data or by buying a better model. They got there by treating governance as a financial performance variable, not a compliance checkbox, and by building the lineage and controls that make trust possible at scale. Kona Kai's data supply chain assessment is built to answer exactly these questions before tool selection, not after. If you're not certain where your organization would land on that list, that uncertainty is worth resolving now. Get in touch to talk through what the assessment covers. Sources: PwC 2026 AI Performance Study, April 13, 2026 (74%/20% figure and 1.7x/1.5x/2x multipliers confirmed directly at pwc.com); McKinsey, AI Data Readiness: The Key to Scaling Impact, June 2026; Gartner and IDC estimates for the 80-90% unstructured data share; PwC 2026 Digital Trends in Operations Survey.

Agentic AI Changes the Job. Your Workflows Haven't Caught Up.

By Paul Benvenuto • July 29, 2026
Every governance and workflow framework most organizations are running today was built for AI that waits for a human to ask it something. Agentic AI doesn't wait. It initiates, executes, and chains actions across systems on its own, and the workflows built around human initiated, human reviewed steps simply don't have

AI Literacy Isn't Training. It's an Operating Model.

By Paul Benvenuto • July 27, 2026
Education was the number one way companies say they adjusted their talent strategy in response to AI. And yet most organizations still treat training as an event. A workshop. A certificate. A box that gets checked once and never revisited.

Policies Don't Create Governance. Enforcement Does.

By Paul Benvenuto • July 20, 2026
Most organizations think they have AI governance because someone in legal drafted a policy and got it signed off. They don't. A policy sitting in a shared drive doesn't know where your AI is actually running. It doesn't flag it when a model drifts. It doesn't do a single thing when an employee routes a client file thro

The Four Pillars of AI Success: Governance, People, Data, and Process

By Paul Benvenuto • July 20, 2026
Governance, people, data, and process are not sequential steps. They are four load-bearing walls, and in regulated industries, a crack in any one of them shows up as risk somewhere else. Here is where each pillar actually breaks down today, and what the data says about the gap between where most organizations sit and w

Why Regulated Industries May Have an Unexpected AI Advantage

By Carly Whitte • July 1, 2026
AI success depends on more than technology. Governance, regulation, and operational oversight are helping organizations turn AI pilots into scalable business capabilities.

The Missing Ingredient in Healthcare AI Adoption: Accountability

By Carly Whitte • June 27, 2026
Healthcare AI adoption depends on more than technology. Governance, accountability, and AI readiness determine whether AI delivers measurable business value.

The Hidden Enterprise Risk Behind “Vibe Coding”

By Carly Whitte • May 24, 2026
AI-powered “vibe coding” is accelerating enterprise software creation, but governance and security controls are struggling to keep pace. Learn the hidden risks of AI-generated applications and why responsible AI governance is critical for scalable enterprise adoption.

Rethinking AI Skepticism in Healthcare Governance

By Carly Whitte • May 6, 2026
Why does AI adoption stall in healthcare? Discover how accountability, governance, and risk management influence success beyond change management.