Why is Interoperability in Healthcare Important?

October 29, 2021

As you may already know, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or the government agency commonly referred to as “CMS,” developed a roadmap to improve interoperability and health information access for patients, providers, and payers. So why is interoperability important? Read more for a guide on how new CMS regulations promoting interoperability in the healthcare industry will affect your company, and most importantly, how to get help adjusting to the requirements.


What is Interoperability in the Healthcare Context?

Essentially, interoperability means the ability of computer systems or healthcare entities to exchange and make use of information. In the context of the medical industry, interoperability means to enable the sharing of payer, patient or provider related information to simplify tasks and improve the delivery of care. 


For a long time, HIPAA has protected patients’ rights to access their health information. The May 2020 Interoperability and Patient Access final rule takes this a step further, by implementing data standards for sharing, eliminating conditions that would block information and protecting the patients’ right to know whether their health information is exchanged in a way that ensures their privacy and security.


What is the Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule?

As of July 1, 2021, two key CMS policies from the Interoperability and Patient Access final rule are in effect. One policy requires hospitals with certain electronic health record (EHR) capabilities to send admission, discharge, and transfer notifications to other providers. The second requires Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP managed care organizations support sharing Provider Directory information via standard APIs (Application Programming Interfaces). These regulations will certainly change how healthcare information is exchanged between payers, providers, and patients. Ideally, they will lead to greater efficiency standards end-to-end.


As part of the Interoperability and Patient Access final rule, a payer has the right to ask third-party application developers whether their privacy policy specifies secondary data uses. CMS has also partnered with federal agencies such as the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in their efforts to protect patients’ right to the privacy of their health data.


Due to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, in September 2021, CMS announced that it would “not take enforcement action against certain payers for the payer-to-payer data exchange provision of the May 2020 Interoperability and Patient Access final rule” until future rulemaking was finalized. This announcement represented CMS’ decision to exercise its discretion in enforcing the payer-to-payer policy temporarily. However, it had no effect on any existing regulatory requirements or implementation timelines previously provided by CMS. Is your company prepared to implement solutions to the new CMS regulations? 


How Should My Company Deal with the Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule?

CMS has identified Health Level 7® (HL7) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR) Release 4.0.1 as “the foundational standard to support data exchange” via APIs (Application Programming Interfaces). Basically, CMS has now adopted the standards for FHIR-based APIs to support the privacy and security of patient information. Below, we’ll briefly break down the API requirements and how they will work:


The Patient Access API: As of January 1, 2021, CMS-regulated payers, i.e., MA organizations, Medicaid Fee-for-Service (FFS) programs, Medicaid managed care plans, CHIP FFS programs, CHIP managed care entities, and QHP issuers are now required to implement and maintain a secure API that allows patients to access their claims, clinical information, and other information, like payment amounts through third-party applications of their choice. The goal is to offer patients a more complete understanding of their interactions with the healthcare system. CMS has stated their goal in enacting the patient access API requirement is to promote improved patient decision-making and, in turn, better health outcomes.


The Provider Directory API: As of January 1, 2021, CMS-regulated payers noted above (except QHP issuers on the FFEs) are now required to make provider directory information publicly available through a standards-based API. CMS has stated its goal with this requirement is to “encourage innovation by allowing third-party application developers to access information so they can create services that help patients find providers for care and treatment, as well as help clinicians find other providers for care coordination, in the most user-friendly and intuitive ways possible.”


The Payer-to-Payer Data Exchange: As of January 1, 2022, CMS-regulated payers will be required to deliver patient health data at the request of the patient. CMS’ goal in enacting this requirement is to allow patients to have information portability when they move from payer to payer, as well as the creation of a collective and complete health record for patients to hold on to. The data required for delivery by payers to patients has been specifically outlined in the U.S. Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) version 1 data set.


What Happens if My Company is Not in Compliance with the Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule?

CMS has announced that it will publicly report clinicians, hospitals, and critical access hospitals that it finds might be blocking the transfer of information mandated by the Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule. Providers must list or update their digital contact information in the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Providers should provide their digital contact information, including secure digital endpoints such as a Direct Address and/or an FHIR API endpoint.

 

Implementing a Process for Compliance with the Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule Doesn’t Have to be Difficult.

The Kona Kai Corporation is staying on top of advancements in guidelines, directives, and the latest technology. KKC has the dedicated resources to help organizations adopt and implement HL7® /FHIR standards. They have invested significant time in understanding what these standards are, and how to leverage them to help companies automate or streamline their systems.

 

KKC can guide your company in its objective to establish a system complying with the new CMS regulations enacted as part of the Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule. KKC can also see this process through comprehensive implementation.[PB1]  KKC is your partner through your adaptation to new regulations, and we’re always here to help. Contact us for more information.


INSIGHTS

By Carly Whitte March 4, 2026
Learn how to build self-serve AI analytics dashboards in CRM. Quick wins, best practices, and expert tips to empower sales and service teams 
By Carly Whitte February 24, 2026
Discover the four levels of AI readiness and assess where your organization stands. Learn how to move from experimentation to scalable, responsible AI adoption.
February 16, 2026
As organizations head into 2026, the conversation around artificial intelligence (AI) is changing. The early years of AI adoption were dominated by experimentation. Proofs of concept multiplied. Vendors promised transformation. Internal teams explored use cases in pockets across the organization. Yet for many enterprises, the results have been uneven at best. In 2026, AI success is more than access to advanced models or cutting-edge tools and will be driven by execution. Organizations that struggle with AI rarely lack ambition but instead lack the structure and organizational readiness. Here’s what you can expect to see in 2026. Agentic AI Goes Beyond Experimentation Agentic AI is often described as the next frontier: AI systems that can reason, plan, and take action autonomously. In theory, this represents a major leap forward. In practice, 2026 will expose a hard truth: autonomy without discipline or readiness creates risk faster than value. The most effective organizations will deploy agentic AI deliberately within clearly defined operational boundaries. Agentic AI will increasingly be used to coordinate workflows, surface decision options, and manage repetitive execution across systems, while humans retain ownership over judgment and accountability. The intelligence of the agent matters far less than how well it is integrated into existing processes and platforms. When agentic AI operates outside governed systems of record, organizations lose visibility, auditability, and trust. When it is embedded directly into the operating model, it strengthens execution and amplifies impact instead of introducing risk. In practice, we are already seeing this distinction play out. One organization attempted to deploy autonomous agents across customer operations without clear escalation paths or system boundaries, quickly creating confusion and rework. Another embedded agentic AI narrowly within its CRM workflows to triage cases, surface next-best actions, and route work, reducing cycle time while preserving human accountability. The difference was the discipline of its deployment and readiness of the company . In 2026, agentic AI will succeed quietly inside workflows , under guardrails, and in service of execution rather than experimentation. The Shift from Models to Systems The advantage of having access to the most advanced AI model will be minimal. Models will improve, but they will also become more interchangeable. The differentiator will be the system surrounding them. Organizations that see real returns from AI will focus on how data moves, how decisions are made, and how outcomes are measured. AI does not operate in isolation. It inherits the strengths and weaknesses of the environment in which it is deployed. At KKC, we often see AI initiatives stall because foundational questions were never addressed. Data may exist, but not be trusted. Platforms may be implemented, but not integrated. Processes may be documented, but not followed. AI simply exposes these gaps faster. We frequently see organizations using the same AI tools achieve radically different outcomes. In one case, two teams implemented similar predictive capabilities. One struggled due to inconsistent data definitions and disconnected platforms. The other succeeded by first aligning data ownership, integrating systems of record, and defining how insights would be acted upon. The technology was identical. The system was not. In 2026, the most successful AI programs will be built on strong systems thinking. They will prioritize reliability over novelty and consistency over speed. These organizations may appear slower at first, but they will compound value over time while others reset their strategy yet again. Governance and Accountability Take Center Stage AI governance is now a practical requirement. As AI moves deeper into decision-making, organizations will face growing pressure to explain how outcomes are generated, who is responsible for them, and how risks are managed. This pressure will come not only from regulators, but from customers, boards, and internal teams who expect clarity and control. Effective governance doesn’t limit innovation; it enables it to scale safely. Organizations that invest in clear ownership models, defined approval paths, and ongoing monitoring will move faster because they eliminate uncertainty and rework. In regulated and complex environments, governance determines speed. Organizations without clear ownership stall decisions while debating risk. Those with defined approval models, monitoring, and escalation paths move faster because teams know exactly how to proceed. Governance removes friction while not slowing AI down. In 2026, governance will be recognized as infrastructure instead of overhead. AI Readiness Is No Longer Just Technical One of the most underestimated shifts heading into 2026 is the recognition that AI readiness is as much about people as it is about technology. Many organizations underestimate the cultural impact of AI. Teams may distrust outputs they do not understand. Leaders may struggle to explain how AI fits into decision-making. Employees may fear replacement rather than augmentation. When these concerns are not addressed, adoption stalls, even when the technology works. In several organizations we’ve observed, AI tools technically performed as designed but were quietly ignored. Teams lacked confidence in outputs, managers hesitated to rely on recommendations, and adoption plateaued. Where leaders invested in education, role clarity, and communication, usage increased without changing the underlying technology. Organizations that succeed in 2026 will invest intentionally in education, communication, and change management. They will articulate not just what AI does, but why it exists and how it supports human decision-making. They will prepare leaders to lead differently and teams to work differently. AI is success often depends more on the operating model shift than the actual technology rollout. From AI Theater to Real Outcomes By 2026, patience for AI initiatives without measurable impact will be gone. Executives will expect clear business cases, defined success metrics, and visible progress. AI strategies will increasingly resemble other enterprise transformation efforts grounded in financial outcomes, operational efficiency, and long-term scalability. At KKC, we help organizations move beyond AI theater by focusing on where AI creates tangible value and where it does not. Not every process should be automated. Not every decision should involve AI. Disciplined prioritization will be a competitive advantage. We see many organizations measure AI progress by the number of pilots launched. The more successful ones measure it by decisions improved, hours saved, or revenue protected. In 2026, output metrics will replace activity metrics, and many AI programs will not survive that transition. The organizations that thrive will stop chasing AI for its own sake and start using it as a tool to strengthen execution. What 2026 Will Really Reward AI will continue to evolve rapidly. The organizations that benefit most from it will be the most prepared. In 2026, advantage will belong to organizations that: Build systems, not experiments Treat governance as an enabler Invest in readiness, not just tools Focus on execution over ambition AI has moved beyond proving what is possible. The focus now is delivering what matters consistently, at scale, and with confidence. Organizations that make this shift will define the next generation of AI leaders. At Kona Kai Corporation, we help organizations make that shift. We bring structure to AI initiatives that feel fragmented, turn ambition into executable roadmaps, and help teams move from pilots to real business impact. If your organization is ready to move beyond experimentation and into execution, 2026 is the year to do it, intentionally .
By Carly Whitte February 6, 2026
Celebrating 20 years of digital transformation success, Kona Kai Corporation has helped organizations navigate technology change, drive measurable business outcomes, and evolve from early CRM and process optimization to AI-driven solutions grounded in people, governance, and real results.
By Carly Whitte January 2, 2026
AI can deliver real value in 2026 for organizations with the right foundations. Explore AI readiness, proven use cases, and scalable adoption strategies.
By Carly Whitte December 31, 2025
Enterprises are adopting agentic AI, but success requires governance, readiness, data integrity, and human oversight. Build trust and scale with control.
By Carly Whitte December 30, 2025
Most AI programs fail from readiness gaps, not technology. Discover how to assess data, processes, governance, and platforms for scalable AI success.
By Carly Whitte December 5, 2025
Learn how to prepare your operations team to manage and monitor AI agents effectively. Explore key frameworks for governance, lifecycle management, and human–agent collaboration.
By Carly Whitte December 4, 2025
Learn how to design emotionally intelligent AI systems that combine empathy and accuracy. Build trust, prevent harm, and elevate customer experience.
By Carly Whitte November 27, 2025
Discover how a CRM-powered Digital Front Door transforms patient experience by connecting every touchpoint into a seamless, personalized journey. Learn how healthcare organizations can improve engagement, strengthen loyalty, and deliver coordinated care that builds long-term trust.